2009 Renault Megane vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW X5 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Renault Megane. (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Megane.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 300 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Renault Megane | 2002 BMW X5 | |
Make | Renault | BMW |
Model | Megane | X5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 89.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Top Speed | 236 km/hour | 202 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 12.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 93 L |