2009 Renault Megane vs. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 would be higher. At 2,981 cc, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FCHV 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 (353 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Megane. (300 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Megane. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 has automatic transmission and 2009 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2009 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Megane | 2002 Toyota FCHV 5 | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Megane | FCHV 5 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2981 cc |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Top Speed | 236 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 2720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |
