2009 Renault Scenic vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Renault Scenic is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,868 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Riley RM A weights approximately 20 kg more than 2009 Renault Scenic.
Because 1950 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Renault Scenic | 1950 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Renault | Riley |
| Model | Scenic | RM A |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 1868 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2870 mm |
