2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe vs. 1992 Volvo 960

To start off, 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 6,749 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe (448 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1992 Volvo 960. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe has automatic transmission and 1992 Volvo 960 has manual transmission. 1992 Volvo 960 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom Drophead Coupe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: