2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,749 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom (448 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom (531 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Toyota Matrix. 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 2010 Toyota Matrix has manual transmission. 2010 Toyota Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
Model | Phantom | Matrix |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6749 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 448 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5350 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 531 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 50 L |