2009 Saturn Aura vs. 1978 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2009 Saturn Aura is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Aura is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Aura (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Aura should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saturn Aura weights approximately 245 kg more than 1978 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Aura, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Aura (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Aura will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 1500. 2009 Saturn Aura has automatic transmission and 1978 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1978 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saturn Aura will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: