2009 Saturn Outlook vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Saturn Outlook | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Saturn | Triumph |
| Model | Outlook | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 277 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1660 mm |
