2009 Saturn Outlook vs. 2004 Scion xB
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Scion xB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Scion xB would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (277 HP) has 169 more horse power than 2004 Scion xB. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 2004 Scion xB.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Saturn Outlook | 2004 Scion xB | |
| Make | Saturn | Scion |
| Model | Outlook | xB |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 277 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 253 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
