2009 Saturn Outlook vs. 2006 Scion xB
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Scion xB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Scion xB would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2006 Scion xB. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 2006 Scion xB.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Scion xB. (137 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Saturn Outlook | 2006 Scion xB | |
Make | Saturn | Scion |
Model | Outlook | xB |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 277 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 253 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |