2009 Saturn Vue vs. 1963 Volvo 120
To start off, 2009 Saturn Vue is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Vue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Vue (167 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1963 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Vue should accelerate faster than 1963 Volvo 120.
Because 1963 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Vue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Vue (160 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Vue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Saturn Vue | 1963 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Saturn | Volvo |
| Model | Vue | 120 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2384 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
