2009 Smart ForTwo vs. 1971 Subaru R-2
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Subaru R-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Subaru R-2 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1971 Subaru R-2. (27 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1971 Subaru R-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Smart ForTwo (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Subaru R-2. (40 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Subaru R-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Smart ForTwo | 1971 Subaru R-2 | |
Make | Smart | Subaru |
Model | ForTwo | R-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 1000 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2700 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1870 mm | 1930 mm |