2009 Smart ForTwo vs. 1980 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 999 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Smart ForTwo (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Smart ForTwo | 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Smart | Suzuki |
Model | ForTwo | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 537 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 2700 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1870 mm | 1940 mm |