2009 Subaru Outback vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (163 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet has manual transmission. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Subaru Outback | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Subaru | Aston Martin |
| Model | Outback | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2457 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
