2009 Subaru Outback vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (243 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Outback (327 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Subaru Outback | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Subaru | Holden |
Model | Outback | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2457 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 243 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 327 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |