2009 Suzuki Equator vs. 1982 Volkswagen Jetta

To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Jetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Jetta would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Suzuki Equator weights approximately 220 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Jetta.

Because 2009 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Jetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1982 Volkswagen Jetta has manual transmission. 1982 Volkswagen Jetta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Suzuki Equator 1982 Volkswagen Jetta
Make Suzuki Volkswagen
Model Equator Jetta
Year Released 2009 1982
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3954 cc 1270 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 262 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1065 kg 845 kg
Vehicle Length 5600 mm 4200 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 3560 mm 2410 mm