2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs. 2012 Opel Ampera
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Opel Ampera weights approximately 420 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Because 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Ampera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Suzuki Grand Vitara | 2012 Opel Ampera | |
| Make | Suzuki | Opel |
| Model | Grand Vitara | Ampera |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 166 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.2 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 35 L |
