2009 Suzuki Swift vs. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Swift is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept would be higher. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 691 more horse power than 2009 Suzuki Swift. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 2009 Suzuki Swift.
Because 2009 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 667 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Suzuki Swift. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Suzuki Swift. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept has automatic transmission and 2009 Suzuki Swift has manual transmission. 2009 Suzuki Swift will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Suzuki Swift | 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | |
Make | Suzuki | Dodge |
Model | Swift | Charger RT Concept |
Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 3522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 791 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 800 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |