2009 Suzuki Swift vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 2,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (201 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2009 Suzuki Swift. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Suzuki Swift.
Because 2009 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Audi A6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Suzuki Swift | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Audi |
| Model | Swift | A6 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 201 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 75 L |
