2009 Tata Indica vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Tata Indica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Tata Indica would be higher. At 1,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Tata Indica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Tata Indica. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Indica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Tata Indica (115 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2009 Tata Indica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Tata Indica | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Tata | Nissan |
Model | Indica | Micra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1405 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 46 L |