2009 Tata Nano vs. 2002 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volkswagen Golf. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volkswagen Golf would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Golf is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Golf (113 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen Golf weights approximately 505 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Golf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Golf (172 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Volkswagen Golf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano. 2002 Volkswagen Golf has automatic transmission and 2009 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2009 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volkswagen Golf will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Tata Nano | 2002 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Tata | Volkswagen |
Model | Nano | Golf |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 624 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 48 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4148 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2512 mm |