2009 Tata Nano vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Tata Nano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Tata Nano would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Tata Nano | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Tata | Holden |
| Model | Nano | Epica |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 624 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 48 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
