2009 Toyota 4Runner vs. 1997 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 158 kg more than 2009 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2009 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Toyota 4Runner | 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Toyota | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 4Runner | 164 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3954 cc | 2968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 236 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1352 kg | 1510 kg |
