2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser vs. 2004 MCC Silverpulse
To start off, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Silverpulse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Silverpulse would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC Silverpulse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser | 2004 MCC Silverpulse | |
Make | Toyota | MCC |
Model | FJ Cruiser | Silverpulse |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3954 cc | 699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 239 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |