2009 Toyota Highlander vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 2009 Toyota Highlander is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,456 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 240. (104 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 240.
Because 2009 Toyota Highlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Highlander (336 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Toyota Highlander | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Highlander | 240 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3456 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 336 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2650 mm |