2009 Toyota Highlander vs. 2002 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2009 Toyota Highlander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Samsung SM3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Samsung SM3 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Highlander (266 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Highlander (249 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Toyota Highlander | 2002 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Toyota | Samsung |
Model | Highlander | SM3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 266 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 249 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |