2009 Toyota Matrix vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 148 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Toyota Matrix. (174 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1980 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Toyota Matrix | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Matrix | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2640 mm |