2009 Volkswagen Beetle vs. 1983 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Beetle is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Beetle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Beetle (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Beetle should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 2101.
Because 1983 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Beetle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Beetle (172 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Beetle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volkswagen Beetle | 1983 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Zastava |
Model | Beetle | 2101 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2430 mm |