2009 Volkswagen CC vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen CC is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen CC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen CC (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen CC should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Because 1965 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen CC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen CC (281 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen CC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volkswagen CC | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Volkswagen | ZAZ |
Model | CC | 966 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 72.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 54.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2170 mm |