2009 Volkswagen Citi vs. 1974 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Citi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Citi (100 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Citi should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 1300.
Because 1974 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Citi (140 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Citi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volkswagen Citi | 1974 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Zastava |
Model | Citi | 1300 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |