2009 Volkswagen Citi vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen Citi. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen Citi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Citi weights approximately 20 kg more than 1980 Volvo 260.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 260 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volkswagen Citi. (124 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volkswagen Citi | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
Model | Citi | 260 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1423 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.8 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |