2009 Volkswagen Citi vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Volkswagen Citi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Volkswagen Citi would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 1000 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen Citi. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Koenigsegg Agera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volkswagen Citi | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | Volkswagen | Koenigsegg |
Model | Citi | Agera |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 1100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Biofuel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.7 seconds | 2.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |