2009 Volkswagen Polo vs. 1981 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 2101.
Because 1981 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volkswagen Polo | 1981 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Zastava |
Model | Polo | 2101 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2430 mm |