2009 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2011 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2011 Nissan Cube is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Cube. (122 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volkswagen Polo | 2011 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Volkswagen | Nissan |
Model | Polo | Cube |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |