2009 Volvo C30 vs. 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Volvo C30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Volvo C30 would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 1042 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C30. (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo C30 weights approximately 348 kg more than 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Because 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Volvo C30 | 2011 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
| Make | Volvo | SSC |
| Model | C30 | Ultimate Aero |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2520 cc | 6350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 1269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6075 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1090 mm |
