2009 Volvo C30 vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Volvo C30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Volvo C30 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo C30 | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Volvo | Nissan |
Model | C30 | Leaf |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |