2009 Volvo C70 vs. 2000 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2000 Honda CR-V. (148 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda CR-V.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo C70 | 2000 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Volvo | Honda |
Model | C70 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2521 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6 |
Top Speed | 239 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10 L/100km |