2009 Volvo C70 vs. 2000 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2000 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2000 ZAZ Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 ZAZ Wagon. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 ZAZ Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Volvo C70 | 2000 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Volvo | ZAZ |
| Model | C70 | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2521 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 224 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 236 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1570 mm |
