2009 Volvo C70 vs. 2006 Ascari A10
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ascari A10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ascari A10 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ascari A10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ascari A10 (625 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 401 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C70. (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ascari A10 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C70.
Because 2006 Ascari A10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ascari A10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ascari A10 (560 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Ascari A10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo C70 | 2006 Ascari A10 | |
Make | Volvo | Ascari |
Model | C70 | A10 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2521 cc | 4941 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 625 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 560 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 239 km/hour | 346 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1852 mm |