2009 Volvo C70 vs. 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 840 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C70. (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C70.
Because 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 824 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo C70 | 2011 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Volvo | Koenigsegg |
Model | C70 | CCXR |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2521 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Top Speed | 239 km/hour | 400 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1996 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 18 L/100km |