2009 Volvo C70 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi ASX
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi ASX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi ASX. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi ASX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mitsubishi ASX. (196 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mitsubishi ASX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo C70 | 2012 Mitsubishi ASX | |
Make | Volvo | Mitsubishi |
Model | C70 | ASX |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2521 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 224 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |