2009 Volvo S40 vs. 2012 Holden Barina
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Volvo S40 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Barina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S40 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Barina. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Barina. 2009 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Barina has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Barina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo S40 | 2012 Holden Barina | |
Make | Volvo | Holden |
Model | S40 | Barina |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2521 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |