2009 Volvo V50 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Volvo V50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Volvo V50 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V50 (168 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo V50 (230 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Volvo V50 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Volvo | Nissan |
| Model | V50 | Micra |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2435 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 46 L |
