2009 Volvo XC70 vs. 1982 Ford Telstar
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC70 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC70 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Because 2009 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Telstar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC70 (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo XC70 | 1982 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Volvo | Ford |
Model | XC70 | Telstar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3192 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2520 mm |