2009 Volvo XC90 vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 832 more horse power than 2009 Volvo XC90. (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo XC90.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 824 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo XC90. (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo XC90. 2009 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR has manual transmission. 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo XC90 | 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
Make | Volvo | Koenigsegg |
Model | XC90 | CCXR |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3192 cc | 4719 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 1064 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 236 Nm | 1060 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 18 L/100km |