2009 Volvo XC90 vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 4,414 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (311 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2013 Volvo S60. (296 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 131 kg more than 2009 Volvo XC90.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 441 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Volvo XC90 | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | XC90 | S60 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4414 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5850 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 441 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1602 kg | 1733 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |