2010 Ascari KZ1 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ascari KZ1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ascari KZ1 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ascari KZ1 weights approximately 95 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2010 Ascari KZ1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ascari KZ1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM). This means 2010 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Ascari KZ1 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Ascari | Mini |
Model | KZ1 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3758 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1852 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1138 mm | 1391 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2636 mm | 2467 mm |