2010 Audi A5 vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Audi A5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Audi A5 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2010 Audi A5. (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi A5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi A5. (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi A5.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Audi A5 | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A5 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4625 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1382 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2751 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 76 L |