2010 Audi R8 vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2010 Audi R8 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 292 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi R8 (429 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2010 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V. 1996 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2010 Audi R8 has manual transmission. 2010 Audi R8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Audi R8 | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Audi | Honda |
| Model | R8 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4200 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 420 HP | 128 HP |
| Torque | 429 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4435 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1905 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1252 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2649 mm | 2620 mm |
