2010 BMW 123 vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2010 BMW 123 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 123 (202 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1996 Honda CR-V. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 123 should accelerate faster than 1996 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 15 kg more than 2010 BMW 123.
Because 1996 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 123. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 123 (400 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda CR-V. (180 Nm). This means 2010 BMW 123 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2010 BMW 123 | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 123 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2010 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 128 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 180 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4239 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1748 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1421 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2620 mm |