2010 BMW 325 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 BMW 325 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 325 (217 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 325. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 2010 BMW 325 has manual transmission. 2010 BMW 325 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 BMW 325 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 325 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4624 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1811 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1384 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2490 mm |
